We are all aware of the barbaric acts of ISIS, al Qaeda and the others flying the Black Flag. Sadly their violence continues to kill innocents around the world and here at home. They fight in the cause of Jihad to impose their totalitarian religion on all people. But they are not the only ones working toward that goal. There are other Islamist groups who seem much less dangerous on the surface, but actually represent an even more insidious threat to free western society. They seek to use our very freedoms as weapons against us.
Ben Judah is a journalist who comes especially well-recommended. His two books, one about Russia and the other about London, have been hailed for their shockingly honest accounts of unpleasant truths. Of his work on London, the New Statesman reviewer wrote: “Every MP should be given a copy immediately. On every page lies an uncomfortable truth, in every paragraph sheer horror.”
“The French are too scared to come and shop in Saint-Denis since the attacks. There’s fear. There’s less order — less police, more druggies, more dealers and more thieves. It’s getting worse. I tell you — ten years ago it was not this bad.”
How does the French state explain all this? I take the butcher’s accusation to the prefect. Grey-haired Philippe Galli is Saint-Denis’s most powerful official and the president’s envoy to the department of Seine-Saint-Denis. His throaty, gravelly voice is accustomed to power.
“Those same people who say there is a lack of authority,” snaps the 60-year-old prefect, “are the same ones who refuse the police access when they try and enter. Those from the Maghreb, by origin, permit themselves to behave in ways that would be unthinkable where they came from.”
He tells me that the secret services are currently monitoring 700 people at risk of radicalisation in Saint-Denis, and the police are too frightened to enter alone most areas under his control.
Meanwhile, with French native birthrates continuing to be below replacement level, mass immigration has continued apace. A quarter of teenagers in France are now Muslims, implying a future in which any radicalized Islam poses only a greater threat to the stability of the Republic. Second generation immigrants, according to several major inquiries, seem to be the ones most inclined to radicalization. The problems of France today may well pale in comparison to the problems of a generation from now.
Already Judah’s article identifies a rising Antisemitism that is driving French Jews from their homes. But it is also driving non-Jewish French from their homes, and making those who continue to live in the changing neighborhoods feel besieged.
The response by the French has been a rising nationalism. Even al Qaeda’s top figure in charge of recruting from France has endorsed the National Front. “If the French don’t want war, they should vote Marine Le Pen,” he said. “OK, she’s a woman, and one can call her a racist. But at least she defends the true values of France.”
Does she? Judah cites a gay leftist who has come to feel inclined towards a more nationalist politics. “I realised… my error of interpretation on immigration and Islamisation, which is a danger to liberty…. [A]ll around us this rise of halal, this halalisation of France through its dishes, it’s a conquest of France through its dishes, if you look closely.”
That has parallels in Germany, where nationalism is also rising as a response. These stories may not be pleasant to read, but every wise person should consider them, and ponder what is to be done.
When can you kill civilians with suicide bombers? Also, what does it take to qualify as a "civilian" who might enjoy any level of protection from suicide bombs?
The President has clear Constitutional authority to pause immigration from countries and regions known to be incubators for jihadi terrorism in defense of U.S. national interests.