The Slaves of Your Right Hand

An update on the Pakistani-led sex-slave rings in England.

BY Bruce Cornibe · | September 7, 2016

It’s hard to image many other things more sinister than child rape; however, a lot of people in the UK are turning a blind eye to the unimaginable act out of fear of being labeled a racist or Islamophobe. It’s pretty obvious which community is perpetrating this child rape crisis in the UK, CBN News reports:

Former Home Secretary and parliament member Jack Straw once said, “There’s a particular problem involving Pakistani heritage men who target young, vulnerable, white English girls.”  He also said these Pakistani heritage men view white English girls as “easy meat.”

This is when some shout ‘racism,’ but here are the facts: calculations based on convictions show that a British Muslim male is 170 times more likely to be a part of sex grooming gang than a non-Muslim. And there are no recorded instances of non-Muslims doing this to Muslim girls as part of a criminal enterprise. In one local jurisdiction, it was estimated that six out of seven Muslim males either knew about, or were part of, a grooming gang.

The UK’s politically correct politicians and media seem more concerned with protecting the Pakistani Muslim community from ‘anti-Muslim bigotry’ or ‘Isalmophobia’ than protecting the physical safety of some of its most defenseless citizens – its young girls. This is why you’ll see this Muslim community usually referred to as “Asians” – in order to conceal their religious and ethnic identities. CBN News also reveals how the perverts within this community target and lure vulnerable girls into prostitution, and the other despicable ways they treat their victims:

The grooming gangs have been traced back as far as the late 1980s. At-risk white English girls, often from broken homes and some as young as nine years old, were wooed or “groomed” by teenage Muslim boys called ‘Romeos’ and even by groups of Muslim men who hung around school gates. The girl would be made to feel important; given gifts and drugs. She was being groomed to be a drug addicted prostitute. Then came the gang rapes. They were threatened with death if they tried to flee.

Igler [a policy analyst] says, “The thing you have to understand about this rape of children is it’s not just sexual abuse. It is unspeakable levels of violence, victims being raped with knives, victims being raped with bottles, victims having their tongues nailed to tables. These are sometimes girls who are picked up from a children’s home on a Friday, are being raped during the course of a weekend by hundreds of men and returned with bleeding groins back to the children’s’ home on a Monday morning and they don’t do anything about it at all.”

We have seen the horrific accounts of the Rotherham case where at least 1,400 girls were allegedly sexually exploited (raped, tortured, prostituted, among others) for over a decade – largely perpetrated by Muslim males from the Pakistani community. Also, there are concerns that there is a similar type situation in Telford, England. In the Rotherham case we saw how the group called British Muslim Youth (BMY) had the nerve to actually boycott police after the scandal became public – using the victimization tactic that Islamists have been deploying for years. In fact, it was this same ‘Islamophobia’ narrative that helped allow the Rotherham criminals to operate for so many years because police were allegedly apprehensive about being perceived as committing “racism.”

So why the prevalence of this sexual exploitation of girls in UK’s Pakistani Muslim community? Some may blame cultural/tribal factors (ex. specific region of Pakistan), but we do see similar problems of Muslim immigrants sexually abusing European women throughout Europe (ex. massive outbreak of sexual assault at a New Year’s Eve celebration in Cologne, Germany). Maybe there’s something deeper in Islamic doctrine that’s providing legitimation for this evil. Immanuel Al-Manteeqi reveals how having female captives for a Muslim man’s carnal pleasures are justified under Sharia law, stating:

What is particularly egregious in Sharia is that warriors are permitted to capture the women of “infidels” and use them for their sexual gratification. According to Q 4:3, Q 4:24, Q 23:5-6, Q 70:22-30, having female slaves, “those whom your right hand possess” (ما ملكت ايمانكم, transliterated as ma malikat aymānikum), is permissible.

Furthermore, interpreting ma malikat aymānikum as “female slaves” is not something that, pace Western-Muslim apologists, is something that is only advanced by so-called Islamophobes. Our earliest tafsīr (Qur’ānic exegesis), the tafsīr of Muqātil Ibn Sulaymān, states that ma malikat aymānikum means walā’id (ولائد), which denotes female slaves.[12] This view has been held by many mufasirīn (exegetes) since medieval times, and A.J. Droge’s recent 2013 scholarly translation of the Qur’ān, which is, in my opinion, the best English translation around, explains the phrase “those whom your right hand possess” as straightforwardly referring to female slaves.

Having female slaves, Droge explains, is permissible even when the (Muslim) male is married.[13] Indeed, the Qur’ān contrasts female slaves with married women a few times, clearly demonstrating female slaves were not considered to be wives. There can be no doubt that in using the term ma malikat aymānikum, the Qur’ān is here referring to females who have been captured during war for the sexual gratification of their male captors. Indeed, reading Ibn Iṣ hāq’s Sīrat Rasūl Allāh, we can discern that Muhammad himself took female concubines and permitted his warriors to do likewise as well.

So, do Muslims really adhere to this kind of interpretation? At least one imam in the UK (Wales) openly agrees that Muslims can have sexual relations with their female captives. Imam Ali Hammuda from Cardiff’s Al-Manar Mosque states:

“…towards the end of time there will be many wars like what we are seeing today, and because of these wars women will be taken as captives, as slaves, yeah, women will be taken as slaves.

“And then, her master has relations with her because this is permissible in Islam, it’s permissible to have relations with a woman who is your slave or your wife.”

In conclusion, there seems to be more to the sexual abuse of mostly white non-Muslim girls in the UK at the hands of predominantly Pakistani Muslim males than just a few depraved individuals. It appears to be more of a systematic effort from radical Islamists aimed at humiliating the inferior ‘infidels’ that we see in Islamic texts. With political correctness at the mercy of Islamists, the Muslims committed to this ‘rape jihad’ will continue to operate until the authorities muster up the courage to thwart this evil.



Truces & Dual Messages

Under Islamic law, the maintenance of a peaceful status quo cannot serve as the basis for a truce when the milestones favor Islamic success in Jihad.

Taqiyya, Trust & Debating Shariah

According to Islamic law, one of the areas in which lying is permitted, and sometimes required, is where it will be advantageous in dealings with attempts to gain the submission of non-believers.


Child Brides in Germany

Sharia treats girls as marriageable at very young ages, following the example of Muhammad himself.


Muhammad “History’s First Feminist”??

An article claims that Muhammad was history's first feminist. Let's look at a few examples of why this is a silly thing to say.


Domestic Violence and Sharia, the UK versus Saudi Arabia

The UK's system of sharia courts seems to be undermining the criminal law against domestic violence among British Muslims, while the Saudis introduce a new innovation in whipping.